ANTI-ZOOLOGICAL aspects of “I-AMRICAN” efforts to subdue the Planet Earth
Introduction + Part 1 of 3
3100 words + P.S.
Introduction
In September 2003 I delivered, at the World Public Forum Dialogue of Civilisations (WPFDC), held at the island of Rodes, an important speech, which became more widely known under the title RELIGIOUS ROOTS OF AMERICAN SUPERPOWER. Its text I find at present only at marginal websites “Amerika” and “esinislam”, and its Spanish version at “Academia.edu”. It was published at the quarterly “World Affairs” New Delhi (vol 7, no 4, 2003). In this Indian periodical (vol 7 no 2) one can find also my earlier literary achievement titled “Towards Merchant-Warrior Planetary Super-State”.
In this rarely quoted text, completed exactly 20 years ago, I prophetically wrote that “the very formulation of human rights contributed – and contributes – to the criminal corruption of our Euro-American culture, which inexorably evolves into brainless, ever more malignant ‘humanoid’ cancer. (…) The seven deadly sins of yore have become principal values of the modern world, dominated by an exclusively commercial ideology.”
These, known already to gentile Greeks and Romans DEADLY SINS (pride, greed, wrath, envy, lust, gluttony and sloth), after the rapid dismantling of the Soviet “Red” Empire, quickly mutated from the widely recognized “social evil” into an OVERT PRIDE of the Americanized West. We can observe this fact during numerous at prеsent Gay Pride Parades, and other manifestations exalting the LUST (lat. Luxuria) inherent to the LGBT movement. Ironically we may say that colors “Red” and “Blue”, symbolizing the American dominant “Democratic” and “Republican” parties, of which colors is composed the USA flag, are being reinforced by more “versatile” GLOBALIST BANNERS consisting of SIX COLORS of a RAINBOW “circumcised” of its natural SEVENTH violet timbre. Inspired by this „abbreviated rainbow”, I propose to abbreviate the word ‘America’, into assembled from only 6 letters AMRICA – thanks to this linguistical microoperation at once we know about what we are going to talk about! (“I” in the title of this pamphlet about “‘I-Amrican’ efforts” is an abbreviation of terms like Imbecility, Idiocy, etc.)
Below, the “supranational” LGBT banner at the entrance to the USA Embassy in Moscow
The very COMMERCIAL ORIGIN of this New Pride of the West, was explained by French Jewish journalist and politician Eric Zemmour during the TV interview with him. According to Zemmour a small but dedicated group of men of politics and of finance astutely exploited the widespread, in actual LIBERAL society, belief in the total EQUALITY of men and women. Profiting from this social psychosis they “pushed” the program of equalizing, in terms of the formal law, homosexual marriages with these heterosexual ones.
Zemmour rightly observed that in the case of heterosexual marriages, which original purpose was the assurance of the wellbeing of giving birth mothers and of their offspring, the very idea of equality man/woman is a LURE. Gay and lesbian marriages, assuring financial profits of their participants, similar to these of heterosexual ones, are not different from these marriages made not out of LOVE but out of BUSINESS. Only in France of today up to 30 % of all marriages are realized in order to permit to obtain, by aliens, of the desired by them the French nationality.
Eric Zemmour et Natacha Polony at French TV
As a professional philosopher, I have do add, to the questioned in this relatively short TV show, of the “sacred” at present dogma of equality of human sexes (and races), the opinion on this topics of the pre-christian philosopher Plato. Arguing in a very ZOOLOGICAL manner, in his “Republics”, he remarked that female dogs are equally efficient as male ones, while employed as guardians of the herd of sheep – so also in the human society, females apt for such work, might be equally efficient as male ones. But in general Plato insisted that THE INEQUALITY BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS is at the base of the SOCIAL HARMONY and JUSTICE. As recall us Wikipedia, this philosopher praised “the four virtues of a “just city” wisdom, courage, moderation, and justice. With all of these principles, classes, and virtues, it was believed that a “just city” (polis) would exist”.
The word ‘VIR’ designates in Latin someone of a MASCULINE gender. The glorification by ancient Greek of values, which are traditionally linked with “hombres con cojones”, implicitly suggests that behaviors which are commonly associated with the FEMININE gender (in particular the tendency for HYSTERIA, from ‘hystera’ – an uterus in Greek) have to be kept at bay in a healthy society. In particular the living in 17th century, Jewish philosopher Baruch Spinoza has remarked “that in a society ruled by women, men would be ‘brought up to be inferior in ability’. That is, women in order to maintain power over men, would need to condition males to consider themselves less active and less rational than women, and to internalize ideas which reinforce their inferiority”.
Nearly exactly 350 years after this Spinoza’s prediction, my “comrade in arms” Israel Shamir (whom I visited briefly last summer, in his “family nest” in Kopperberg in Sweden), has published at Ron Unz Rewiew an interesting article “Unmanning the Man”. In it he “put flesh” to Spinoza’s antifeminist fears:
“Everywhere, all over the world, men are losing their place under the sun; it may be more than a coincidence that our freedoms vanish along with them.
Is there a method to this madness? (…) There is an understanding between the holders of power that feminised men are easier to control. Unmanning men is a linchpin in the reprogramming of mankind into an obedient herd, because strong men are unpredictable. Strong men are prone to rebellion, ready for sacrifice and primed for action. It is no coincidence that the enemies of Empire are all masculine males, be they Qaddafi, Castro, Chavez, Lukashenko, Putin – or Julian Assange. It appears the men have been targeted for elimination; the working ants need no sex.
As remarked it, already years ago, in the “Marianne” weekly, the outspoken French journalist Natacha Polony, the notion that “all humans are equal” is deeply rooted in the Christian religious origin of modern societies. This especially in the American one, which Declaration of Independence of 1776 contains this remarkable phrase: “(We consider as) self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.
Once again, a perceptive person notices that such statement is an OVERSIMPLIFICATION: we are created at the moment of the fusion of male and female haploid gametes into a diploid zygote cell, and already at that time our sex and race is decided for the rest of our life. As well as several genetically coded “acquired due to the civilized way of life” malfunctions of our organs (myopia, obesity, the propensity for autism, etc.), which we inherit from our parents and foreparents. Already the old Aristotle has remarked that “the smallest initial deflection from the truth is later on multiplied thousandfold”.In light of arguments of Eric Zemmur, the quoted above PROUD statement of the Declaration of Independence of USA is a LURE. Which fact soon had sinister consequences. In particular it contributed to the extermination, in the short 19 century, of the autochtonous Indian population of USA.
Part 1
The Hebrew Bible origin of the “LUMPEN LOGOS” of St Paul, the concealed porte-parole of the antique divinity called MAMMON
“There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one (sh-t*?) in Christ Jesus” – St Paul, Galatians/3-28
(*A friend to all is a friend to none – Aristotle, circa 330 years before Christ)
According to Fathers Founders of the United States, God created humans intrinsically equal one to another. This assertion of Masonic Builders of USA was constructed after the AUTHORITY of the author of a considerable part of New Testament, apostle Paul, a member “of the nation of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of Hebrews; as to the Law, a Pharisee”(Phil. 3:5). From the history we know that his “13 Letters” had tremendous influence onto the nascent GLOBALIST Christian religion. Soon after the inclusion of writings of this “13th Apostle” into the New Testament – which happend soon after the Council of Nice in 325 AD – the “small” Paulus has became the PRACTICAL FOUNDER of the persisting until now Christian Church!
What kind of a SPIRITUAL STRENGHT emanated – and emanates – from writings of this self-appointed ‘vicar of Christ’?
It is known that future St Paul ignored texts of Gospels, which were completed decades after his death in 64/65 AD. And despite the frequently repeated assertion that he “was a Christian apostle who spread the teaching of Jesus”, in his “Letters” we find hardly a trace of these, strongly anti Pharisean, Jesus’ teachings. Why do churches cultivate this UGLY LIE, and what is the CENTRAL MESSAGE of this self-appointed apostle?
In “Acts” we read that he was “born in Tarsus and brought up in Jerusalem “at the feet of Gamaliel [and] taught according to the perfect manner of the law of the fathers” (Acts 22:3). What kind of a doctrine was teaching this famous “Pharisee doctor of halakha”? Wikipedia recalls “here is only a cryptic dictum, comparing his students to classes of fish”. Gamaliel divided his “fishes” in particular according to the wealth of their parents:
- A ritually pure fish: one who has learnt and understood everything, and is the son of rich parents.
A ritually impure fish: one who has memorized everything by study, but has no understanding, and is the son of poor parents.
Issued from the Pharisee family, the young Saul evidently was considering as “impure” these numerous at his time “populist” leaders in his country, condemning the caste of Pharisees “which tie up heavy burdens and lay them on people’s shoulders, but they themselves are unwilling to move them with so much as their finger” (Mat. 23:4). Issued from a modest family, Jesus from Nazareth was such a dangerous personage, whose teachings were to be somehow put into oblivion. The best by an incessant laudation ofthe history of Jesus’ alleged “superhuman docility” (at the image of the proverbial ‘God’s lamb’), “who by his blood, shed for us on the cross, purchased us from sin, death, and Satan.” (Please notice that in the Gospel of Thomas –which was FORBIDDEN BY THE CHURCH at the time of insertion of “Letters” of Paul into the cannon of NT – there is not a single word about Jesus’ intention to commit such a repugnant act!)
Below I quote Paul’s principal CHURCH BUILDING IDEAS, proudly announced in the chapter 1 of “1 Letter to Corinthians”:
18 For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. 19 For it is written:
“I will destroy the wisdom of the wise;
the intelligence of the intelligent I will frustrate.”
20 Where is the wise person? Where is the teacher of the law? Where is the philosopher of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? (…) 25 For the foolishness of God is wiser than human wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger than human strength. (…) 28 God chose the lowly things of this world and the despised things—and the things that are not—to nullify the things that are, 29 so that no one may boast before him (…).
For any persipacious person, not necessarily a philosopher, this TIRADE radiates with the unbelievable UGLINESS, demonstrating the MENTE CAPTUS nature of this “God’s slave” (in Polish “rab boży”, also in a sense of “God’s Rauber/robber”). As a “philosopher of this age” I am obligated to recall that Paul’s ‘LUMPEN LOGOS’ is an overt attack at the DIVINE REASON, the LOGOS of Greeks, which demands of mature humans to make enunciations in “internally rational way, ordered in agreement with principles of LOGICS.” I have to stress that anyone – be it Paul’s “God in his foolishness” – who marches beyond limits of logical reasoning, automatically positions himself among ordinary CRETINS, which do it, not noticing their idiocy. (By the way, the word ‘cretin’ was derived from old French chrétien – a christian – check your etymological dictionary!)
This TIRADE in “1 Corinthians 1”, loaded with enthusiastic assurances of the type “the intelligence of inteligent I-God will thwart!”, was in large extent copied from the Hebrew Bible, which rationality my colleague, Czech gnostic mgr. Jan Kozák from Prag, summarized in a following way:
From all cultures worshipping the arriving from below strength of a Snake, it was in judaism, in which was the most fully and most reliably elaborated the principle of substitution, whether exchange, of the right for left, upper for lower, internal for external, and the honest and true for deceitful and fake. The very theme of the substitution and turning of everything, which is great, noble and human, into something which is small, criminal and sinful, has become the proclaimed and glorified “sacral” principle. This up to the point that its study is easy.” (“Koreny…”, p.221)
It is thus entirely justifiable to denominate, the MATERIALLY present both in OT and NT “the God of Abram/Abraham, of Jacob/Israel and of Saul/Paul” by the term I-GOD, where “I” is the first letter of common words signifying Imbecility, Idiocy and of course Israel. Please notice that the vovel “I” is absent in Hebrew alphabet, so the REAL meaning of the term ‘I-God’ remains invisible for this alphabet customers. (Latin term ‘imbecilus’ denominates a physically weak person, necessitating a staff to walk; the Greek ‘idiot’ describes an asocial ignorant.)
Once we realize that the claiming to be a model of a SUCCESSFUL christian priest, St Paul was in fact a worshipper of I(i.e. Imbecile, Idiot)-God, we easily grasp the purpose of his “mission to gentiles”. It is explained in sentences, which begin and than end the TIRADE quoted above. In the first one we learn “the message of the cross (…) to us who are being saved, it is the power of God.”
As this “power of God”, radiating from the “beloved” by Christians cross is concerned, my Czech colleague from Prag, ironically commented:
“Crucifix, the cross which protects naive christians “against devil”, driving him away with the thought “you cannot do it yourself, but it is the very sanctity”, has its reciprocal, evidently insidious, visible in the Bible and explicating everything meaning: “I am yours – look I killed the Nazarean man, the man of gnosis at your honor! (…) The christian mass, during which the body of the sacrifice is consumed, and his blood is drunk, is thus the call of Jews to a sin, and to the participation in a murder, this with words “Let’s go to save us from the sin, let’s go to clean us”. “Sinners” united in this way fell under the might of this god of “sinners”, and this god says “I have swept away your offenses like a cloud, your sins like the morning mist. Return to me, for I have redeemed you” .(Isai. 44:22)
ThisMystery of the christian cross, surely facilitates the “spiritual life” of smaller and greater evildoers – and hence it is inviting them to repeat crimes so easily erasable from their memory.
The Mystery of Redemption, which become practicable once “Jesus was slain and hanged on a ‘tree’”, becomes entirely RATIONAL (from the Greek philosophers point of vue), once we see it in the light of statement, ending the quoted above TIRADE. In it Paul describes the most pleasing the I-GOD, activity of his own caste of Pharisees: “God chose the lowly things of this world and the despised things—and the things that are not—to nullify the things that are ( great, noble and human)”. It is an unashamed glorification of HYPOCRISY, which Jesus, known from Gospels, promised not to forgive to anyone!
Why do than churches of all kinds incessantly glorify this “Christian apostle who spread the teaching of Jesus”? The answer is very simple. Despite appearances of selflessness of his mission, Saul/Paul was a cunning Jewish businessman:“If we have sown spiritual seed among you, is it too much if we reap a material harvest from you?” (1 Cor. 9:11). Simply, it was the everlasting (?) DIVINITY of MAMMON, which was animating activities of this MENTE CAPTUS preacher of the New Faith.
Here I am not inventing anything new. Already the emperor Hadrian, in a letter to his nephew, ironically remarked that “Jews and rich Christians pretend to worship Unique God, but in fact they worship Mammon”. As a someone, who grew in the ultra catholic environment ofOld Cracow (PL), after ceasing to be a church goer at my age of 17, I was still a sympathiser of this religion.
And it was a real shock for me, I felt like hit in the back with a knife, when in my age of nearly 40, in september 1981 I’ve read the encyclical letter ”Laborem exercens” of the Polish pope John Paul II. It is centered on a biblical command “Dominate the earth and everythig which dares to move on it”, and it represents the devoid of whatever scruples, veneration of Mammon!
(Karol Wojtyła, probably never worked in his long career; the French sociologist of work, Alain Tourraine, during a conference in Geneva in 1984, called his ideology “neojudaism”.The still living dr Wada Półtawska, a close associate of pope John Paul II, has told my mother already quarter of a century ago that I am “an aggresive atheist”, once she read my brochure “Wojna Bogów” War of Gods, written in 1995 and than published in 3 editions, including the one in Slovakian.)
We are living at present in a period, during which the christianity – also in Poland – is slowly losing its grip on population. My “comrade in arms” Israel Shamir (converted from judaism to orthodoxy in 2004), represents views not so different from these of these of Karl Marx in “On The Jewish Question” from 1844. And he told me several times that the radiating, in particular from the “beacon of the Free World” in form of the USA, the ideology of LIBERAL DEMOCRACY is “a form of judaism, devoid of (visible) God”.
Post Scriptum. Mammon oriented activities of worshippers of I-GOD
During the meeting in 2013 of our group “Mut zur Ethik” in Switzerland, I became acquainted with the book indicated below, published in 2008:
During this meeting, we discussed the modern SOFT POWER methods, how to rip the population, of accumulated by it, modest riches. At this occasion I recalled the published only 12 years ago, David Irving’s formula for collecting Gold with the help of (I-)God:
This internationally known historian, in an interview in 2011 to “The Independent” noticed: “In around 1970, the Jews were advised by a [Jewish] PR firm to give it [Holocaust super event] one name, stick to that name, and stick to those figures and gradually you [Jewish oligarchy] will make billions out of this. That’s what happened.”
Only after this conference I realized that this Irving’s observation (which costed him a year of imprisonment in Austria), is an example of the truly antique method, of earning Gold thanks to appropriate sacrifices to God:
If we substitute in Irwing’s formula:
‘1970’ by ‘70 AD’ and ‘Jews’ by ‘Christians’;
‘Jewish PR firm’ by ‘St. Paul & Co.’;
‘Holocaust super event’ by ‘Christ crucifixion super event’ ; and
‘Jewish oligarchy’ by ‘Christian bishops’
We obtain as a result “Around 70 AD, Christians were advised by St. Paul and Co., to give to the Christ crucifixion super event one name, stick to that name, and stick to this figure – and gradually you Christian bishops will made out of this “innovation” tons of gold (filling in particular the Holy See caves).”
(Remark 2023. At the beginning of the present short pamphlet, I quoted the French publicist and politician Eric Zemmour, who argued that the actual „push” for a total equality men/women, LGBT, etc., is organized, as a purely COMMERCIAL AFFAIR, by a small dedicated group of men of finance and politics. Will they organize, soon, an international affair with a fake „sacral sacrifice” – be it this recent kidnapping of U-krainian children – in order to realize their financial goals?)
End of Part 1 (of 3)
Parts 2 and 3, of the present triptich, will be completed soon